« February, 2020 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
RECENT COMMENTS

The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

What the fuck? This is a joke right? Not a single thing I've read here is true

Angelina

The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

For VIP Surat Escorts service in Aditi Rai for Most Young and Sexy Independent escort in Surat, Call Girls in Surat for any amazing ... http://www.

aditi4surat

The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

<p><a href="http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com/mumbai-call-girls-service.html">mumbai call girls servie</a> <a href="http://madhu-

madhu

The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com/kochi.html http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com/bhopal.html http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com/

madhu

Turkmenia surprises: Arkadag will be instead of Turkmenbashi!

Sharjah Female Escorts +971568790206 Indian Independent Escorts In Sharjah, Sharjah Call GirlsSharjah Female Escorts +971568790206 Indian Independe

Sharjah Female Escorts +971568790206 Indian Independent Sharjah,

Turkmenia surprises: Arkadag will be instead of Turkmenbashi!

Are you looking for checking best form ofSurat Escorts? If yes, you can quit searching for Call Girls in Surat. Y

surat escorts

The truth of history: Wehrmacht, just as SS, slaughtered and raped on a mass scale

This article is full of FALSE information...honestly it seems as though the writer just made most of it up, there is nothing sourced, shows no proo

Emily Vidovic

Turkmenia surprises: Arkadag will be instead of Turkmenbashi!

nice article

nice one

The USA and other organizers of anti-Russian sanctions stand up for Nemtsov's murder

USA go to hell!

Fuck USA!

Turkmenia surprises: Arkadag will be instead of Turkmenbashi!

08450923755 Interesting Post of Escort services, Great to comment on this post really cool and hot sexy escort in this post.....

Rubika Mathur, 08450923755

The American NGOs in Ukraine – legal intelligence and diversionary structures of the USA

The political scientist, the president of the Centre of the system analysis and forecasting Rostislav Vladimirovich Ishchenko tells about consequences of activity of the nongovernmental organizations financed from the budget of the USA in interview to the Internet portal “The world and we”.

- How do you estimate the activity of the US Agency for the International Development (USAID) in Ukraine and also structures coordinated by it: the International Republican Institute (IRI), National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Soros Foundation? On what their activity in Ukraine is directed first of all?


The Soros Foundation breaks loose a little from this list because it is substantially the private organization. Though it also acts the same way, but is financed from private means. And all other organizations very doubtfully can be called nongovernmental because considerable part of financing directly or indirectly is received through the budget of the USA. And it is very essential – “who the girl give the dinner that dances her”. Therefore it would be incorrect to call them nongovernmental or independent, at least. It is clear that the organizations which are financed by the budget of any country and furthermore by the superstate budget, carry out certain political functions. Especially if in their charter it isn't written down that the only thing, than they are engaged is a distribution of soup to the homeless. They serve the state and those who pays them the money and that is quite logical. And even if they only would distribute soup to the homeless and it would be the political function in a certain degree. But in this case they actively advance the interests of the USA, including political interests outside this country. It is actually possible to say that they conduct legal prospecting and diversionary work in the information sphere.

Because today it isn't necessary to blow up bridges or to cut communication lines. It is possible to win wars, without passing borders if the information sphere of the respective state is completely supervised. I will give a simple example. When at the end of 2004, according to the order of the USA, all Ukrainian mass media suddenly “saw the light” and found out that Yushchenko is “their president”, so not least it became the reason of that a large number of the fooled people gathered on the public square. Because if the TV channels didn't inspire them that they are stolen the voices, they wouldn't go anywhere. As all know that if on elections I voted for one and you for another and my candidate won, I didn't steal a voice from you at all. It is one of striking examples of use of information technologies and fight in the information sphere - it isn't necessary to strain at all to change the power in the respective state. Substantially these organizations are occupied and that they practically don't hide. Thus, however, they declare that work not to the sphere of protection of interests of the USA, but in the sphere of democracy advance. But the American government doesn't hide that democracy advance even if it includes carpet bombings, just means the advance of interests of the USA. Therefore the organization data and their affiliated structures and those structures to which they give out the grants are the structures working in interests of the USA. Thus if USAID is the official American organization and Republican Institute is pseudo-analytical structure of Republican Party, so when we speak about our organizations, it is simply the agents of influence of the foreign state in our territory.

-What influence NGOs render on the Ukrainian opposition? With what main opposition forces these organizations cooperate and what this cooperation consists of?

- I would tell that these NGOs are the Ukrainian opposition. Because the tasks of NGOs considerably consist in control over mass media. These people set the agenda in many respects, their representatives work as editors-in-chief, set political trends. Actually they form the information sphere and substantially form the main political trends in Ukraine. Therefore, by the way, despite that now the opposition opposes the so-called “pro-Russian” power, this most “pro-Russian” power puts forward all main theses of opposition, especially in foreign policy. It says that the most important for it is to enter EU, it undersigned for a position “run from Russia”, it tells how doesn't let the Russian business to Ukraine. Though any respecting power wouldn't tell that there is a business of any country which it doesn't let to itself. Usually business always comes in accordance with general practice. You don't let the Russians – it means, you don't let both Americans, and Swisses, and Chinese, and anyone. It testifies that substantially not only for opposition, but also for the power the agenda is set today by this NGOs.

Also it happened because of the objective reasons – because 10-20 years ago only the USA and EU could invest huge money in cultivation the organizations here, in creation of “own” mass media, could carry the journalists and political scientists by carriages, ships, planes to itself and to do the brainwash in the territory. To some extent I would call it as political bribery at the expense of which the special political class of people was created in Ukraine. They are financially interested even not so much in cooperation with the West, not so much in that Ukraine was really integrated into EU, as it was possible to talk continuously and that money continued to pay for it. Actually our opposition and our NGOs are the same people. If you look at opposition lists, constantly there is rather large number of journalists who in a month - two to elections said that they absolutely independent and support none of politicians. But then for some reason went to opposition lists. And not all wishing got there. Because if they took all there would be only journalists and political scientists from the relevant NGOs in lists of opposition.

-Is it true that the considerable support to Arseniy Yatsenyuk and his “Front for Change” is given from the International Republican Institute?

We can assume, suspect, we can even accurately tell that the oppositional organizations anyway work with the American government, with the American budget because at desire it is possible to track a chain from Ukrainian grant recipients up to USAID. But to claim that Yatsenyuk cooperates with any organization we can only when personally Yatsenyuk leaves and will tell that he works with it. Or when the American party will tell that cooperates with Yatsenyuk or Klitschko. But I don't think that we will sometime hear such statements.

- What influence do NGOs render on electoral process in Ukraine?

They influence rather strongly in the ideological respect. If they didn't carry out constant “air contamination” by false political designs, constructions and promises, much less people now voted for opposition forces – all oppositional movements would gain at most 20%-25% across all Ukraine. Therefore, NGOs have very great impact in the ideological respect. A large number of people didn't get used and doesn't want to comprehend information received from mass media. If on TV say that it is good to be the democrat and here, by the way, this thick or thin, beautiful or ugly is the most important democrat, many will pass and vote for this brand because now, allegedly, “all” vote for democrats.

NGOs play very large role in creation of such fashionable brand. On all TV channels, radio programs, newspapers, Internet sites and even from the iron you are told constantly that our purpose is the integration into Europe and as soon as we are integrated, the dairy rivers with a land of milk and honey will begin to flow across Ukraine at once and the manna will fall down. And to carry out all this, of course, have this most “the main democrat”.

As for direct influence on a course of elections, that, despite that we have NGOs who create something like power and even paramilitary structures, without external support and at the minimum readiness of the power not to concede, resist, all these stories about readiness for power opposition cost nothing. Such methods declared by the Ukrainian National Self Defence and “Pora” and now All-Ukrainian Union “Svoboda” constantly tells about the readiness for power opposition, though it is not NGOs, but political party. Nevertheless, with confidence I can tell that one Dnepropetrovsk, Donetsk or Crimean “Golden eagle” will disperse all “Svoboda” for half an hour and won't be even killed and crippled. I don't speak about other marginal and semi-marginal structures as “Svoboda” is the largest of political forces which declares readiness to resolve issues by power way.

But with the corresponding support from abroad, with a political, diplomatic pressure, at threat of introduction of economic sanctions, at threat of use of military force which can loom somewhere behind backs of diplomats, such organizations play very essential role - they give very good reason for intervention to the owners.

- What is your relation that the International Republican Institute gives active support to the Crimean Tatar politicians, what this organization developed the program of the help to Majlis on advance of his representatives in parliament? In your opinion, what purposes are pursued by this organization, carrying out this program?

- Since the time of Kravchuk who invited the Crimean Tatars to come back to the Crimea, they were considered as a counterbalance to the Russian population of the Crimea. It is not a secret that while the state of Ukraine was created, the Russians in the Crimea were most actively adjusted to return to Russia. There were many reasons for which the Crimea was ready to come off Ukraine. To change this ethnopolitical situation in the Crimea, Kravchuk invited the Crimean Tatars in the beginning and then all subsequent presidents and the governments fostered them as the force alternative to the Russian Crimea. Therefore advances with the Crimean Tatars from nationalists, “orange”, any other anti-Russian forces will always proceed.

Unless the Crimean Tatars don't take suddenly a hard pro-Russian line – then they become enemies at once and helpers of the German invaders.

Viewed : 1752   Commented: 0

Author: Mikhail Mikhaylov

Publication date : 18 April 2013 00:53

Source: The world and we

Comments

НАШ КАНАЛ В ДЗЕНЕ