« July, 2024 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11

USA + EU = Reich + SS



Winston Churchill is gulity of thousands of deaths in The Battle of Britain

Winston Churchill was a hero!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jim martin

About the neo-Nazi diarrhea in the countries of the Baltic States or as the USA raise the fascism again

lol https://news.yahoo.com/inside-the-kremlins-disinformation-war-against-ukraine-183128480.html

sir bonklalot

The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

Glory to the heroes.

Taras Lepezdryuchenko

The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

The great "Canadian" "journalist" Argyle Turner, again hot on the heels of something big! Hey Argyle, are your bills still being paid in Ro

насрать Владимиру в глотку

Thousands people oppose the construction of military biological laboratory of the USA in Merefa

It seems the Russians are now going to have a look at what they were doing in the Merefa biological lab


Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

Переклад просто жахливий

Roman Kordun

Excuse us, Russians...



The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

What the fuck? This is a joke right? Not a single thing I've read here is true


The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

For VIP Surat Escorts service in Aditi Rai for Most Young and Sexy Independent escort in Surat, Call Girls in Surat for any amazing ... http://www.


The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

<p><a href="http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com/mumbai-call-girls-service.html">mumbai call girls servie</a> <a href="http://madhu-


The U.S. State Department: Russia prepares aggression against the USA by hand of Chukchi people

http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com/kochi.html http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com/bhopal.html http://madhu-mumbaiescorts.com/


Turkmenia surprises: Arkadag will be instead of Turkmenbashi!

Sharjah Female Escorts +971568790206 Indian Independent Escorts In Sharjah, Sharjah Call GirlsSharjah Female Escorts +971568790206 Indian Independe

Sharjah Female Escorts +971568790206 Indian Independent Sharjah,

Turkmenia surprises: Arkadag will be instead of Turkmenbashi!

Are you looking for checking best form ofSurat Escorts? If yes, you can quit searching for Call Girls in Surat. Y

surat escorts

The truth of history: Wehrmacht, just as SS, slaughtered and raped on a mass scale

This article is full of FALSE information...honestly it seems as though the writer just made most of it up, there is nothing sourced, shows no proo

Emily Vidovic

Turkmenia surprises: Arkadag will be instead of Turkmenbashi!

nice article

nice one

The USA and other organizers of anti-Russian sanctions stand up for Nemtsov's murder

USA go to hell!

Fuck USA!

“Majlis” of the Crimean Tatars is the main factor of intensity in the Crimea

The deputy of three convocations of the Verkhovna Rada of the Crimea Oleg Leonidovich Rodivilov answers the questions of the Internet portal “The world and we”.

- Often it is happen to see in mass media the formulation “the Crimean Tatar people led by Majlis” or “the heads of the Crimean Tatars”. Is the Majlis actually the governing body of the Crimean Tatars?

According to the Constitution of Ukraine in which it is specified that the Ukrainian people - citizens of all nationalities, aren't present and can't be at the Crimean Tatars of any official body which heads them on an ethnic sign. Therefore when Majlis is presented as that one or when Mustapha Jemilev is called as “main Crimean Tatar”, the basic principles of civil society are broken which are so loudly proclaimed in our state. If we speak about creation of civil society in Europe, Ukraine, the Crimea, so such chimeras as “main Crimean Tatar” or “main Russian” are frankly retrograde. All this belongs and to Majlis.

The Majlis is the illegally organized group. According to the decision of the Supreme Council of the Crimea No. 167-1 of October 8, 1992 (http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/oknd.htm) Majlis and its actions are declared as the anti-constitutional. And this decision remains operating to this day. Therefore neither on administrative, nor on criminal, for moral and ethical reasons the Majlis can't be at the head of the Crimean Tatars a priori.

Life and development of the Tatar society shows that except Majlis the considerable part of the Crimean Tatar population supports other organizations and structures. For example, about 15-20% supports the ideas of “Milliy Fırqa”, the organizations, oppositional to Majlis. First of all it is those northern Tatars who were less connected by collaboration in the years of occupation of the Crimea. In this regard they considered that the Soviet state made a mistake, sending them out of limits of the peninsula and rehabilitation of the ethnos and tried to achieve the return to the Crimea.

Besides, both new sects like “Hizb ut-Tahrir” and orthodox like Wahhabites actively form the public Tatar consciousness the last 10 years. And taking into account that initially the Tatars were never the Wahhabites. For the last 8 years according to the former Committee on affairs of religions from 87 Muslim temples which were constructed in the territory of the Crimea, any wasn't constructed by local believers. Leaders of the Majlis got used to say that they suffered most including in questions of departure of a cult, perceive this circumstance with gratitude. But they did nothing to construct at least one temple. The considerable part from that 87 temples is constructed on means of the states and funds in which the prevailing direction of Islam is the Wahhabism. A third part of them is constructed by the funds connected with Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The next third part is constructed by Turkey - its state and semi-state structures. And one more third is constructed by the international funds in which Wahhabites prevail and also on means of the compatriots living in the western countries, first of all in the USA. At present about 15% of the Crimean Tatar population are subject to ideas of the religious directions which aren't historically inherent for the Crimean Tatars.

- What percent of the Crimean Tatars doesn't support Majlis?

As a whole it is possible to claim that about 40-50% of the Tatar population don't see Majlis as the management - 20% of the Crimean Tatars aren't the supporters of Majlis on ideological circumstances - they are more likely his opponents and another 20-25% don't see any advantage in it for various reasons - often because regional Majlises didn't give the land out of turn or any help. For example, many small traders from among Tatars trade on a privilege - don't pay for a trade place. But instead of that they go every Monday under the walls of the Supreme Council of the Crimea and shout: “give us the lands!” And the Majlis if someone from them doesn't come to this action for the disrespectful reason, doesn't provide such privilege for the following half a year. Here is such system of encouragement and punishments at Majlis which forms their “column”. And if someone was offended in that way, so ceases to trust Majlis and holds it up to shame. Or, for example, someone suited the life, and the Majlis wasn't necessary with its system of encouragement.

Besides the Majlis has also very serious system of intimidation, especially in rural areas. They even have such party “Adolat” ("Justice") – the party of “boxers” who directly say that carry out knocking-out of debts from the compatriots and not only financial, but also “moral”. Naturally, it only is called as the party, but in reality it is an illegal organization. Such approaches from Majlis at all don't suit those 15-20% of Tatars who suited the life by themselves. Moreover, they are extremely irritated that there is a certain superstructure which profits on their name.

The others see any advantage in it. And to be fair, it is necessary to tell that there is advantage for this part of the Crimean Tatars from it, but it cultivates special type of egoism in them. The Majlis forces the power to treat Tatars not as to all. The conflict between the Russian and Russian or the Tatar and the Tatar is ordinary. The conflict between the Tatar and Russian is the international conflict in which any power takes the part of the one who is indignant most. Majlis is successful in connection with its penetration into a power vertical, into criminal structures, thanks to receiving numerous grants. At the expense of this interaction they shout more loudly, press on local, republican and even the Kiev authorities more. Also beat out more preferences for representatives of the ethnos. Therefore it is natural that Tatars ask Majlis for the help because from there they receive assurances that they are not guilty in their difficulties, but somebody acting “against them, disadvantaged people”. In this regard a peculiar loop which destroys the international world and tranquillity owing to formation of distinct ethnic stratification is formed. And the considerable part of the Crimean Tatars looks for the help at Majlis and, often, receives from it the certain protection which hasn't been caused by laws of Ukraine.

One more important aspect of current situation – any power needs “bludgeon” to the Russian Crimea in the form of Majlis which distracts the Russians from fight for adequate adaptation in the Ukrainian society which, in connection with a pursued state policy, doesn't see them as the equal participant of the people of Ukraine. Especially it is critical in the Crimea, where the Russians are in the majority. They should be distracted, intimidated something various disorders, including interethnic, military character, threats of any bloody accidents. It is necessary to frighten the society of the Crimea that it didn't show adequate civil activity. It is a corner political question for the Kiev establishment and for nationalist adjusted political forces.

- What influence is rendered by Majlis and that part of the Crimean Tatars which supports it on a situation in the Crimea?

That part of the Crimean Tatar community which perceives Majlis as a certain governing body for itself, has quite considerable destructive impact on a situation in the Crimea. This illegitimate power bears in itself a powerful charge of aggression, inspires the idea of a revenge and the conflict in the supporters: “you obliged us, the Majlis will help us to clear up with you and we will act with you the same way, return our lands and houses!” Thus nobody is going to the old houses where their ancestors really lived. After all it is often, shabby buildings of pre-war and pre-revolutionary construction. Besides, not having a house, you will receive it from the state or in the form of a land and building materials at below cost prices, or in the form of full-fledged housing. And some revanchists plan to receive new housing from the state and then also to demand to return the old.

Similar processes happened in the North Caucasus - in the suburb of Vladikavkaz where Ossetians and Ingushs constantly “are at war”, burn the houses of each other. And the federal and local government very rigidly interferes with the conflict to extinguish it initially. Here, fortunately, it doesn't occur because both Tatar and the Russian party as a whole are inert, but instigators do the work of Majlis. 20 years ago the interethnic situation in the Crimea was much softer and in 20 years it is difficult to predict will the conflict pass to a hot phase. But the conflict exists and is forced constantly.

Therefore the Majlis is a factor of intensity today owing to its not legitimacy, extremism, revanchist foundations which it propagandizes among the Crimean Tatars and receives reciprocal aggression from the majority of the population of the Crimea.

- How the problems of arrangement of the Crimean Tatars are solved? Is the artificial preservation of these problems a good occasion for continuation of policy of self-captures from Majlis?

When Tatars only started moving from Central Asia to the Crimea and started occupying extensive territories on the southern coast of the Crimea and in the Simferopol area, it met though any understanding at local population. It is absolutely other situation with the wave of the self-captures which has begun in 2006. It should be noted especially the reasons of their emergence and that they began next day after elections of 2006.

The members of Majlis are the supporters of “orange”. Yushchenko and his team constrained Majlis in his appetites till the elections because the land captures would harmful would affect the pro-Ukrainian Yushchenko's ratings. After all ethnic Ukrainians even if they also don't live in the Crimea aren't so glad if non Ukrainians seize the land of Ukraine. The Majlis kept the promise before Yushchenko's administration and didn't make self-captures till elections. But right after elections they began to occur in a mass order. And this new “era” of self-captures is harmful not only because of rough violation of town-planning, architectural, logical and even moral standards - the part of the territory of the former concentration camp “Red” is taken. The matter is that arrangement goes still with 1989 and any such program has to have the beginning and the end with the report on the carried-out work. The beginning of a new wave of captures in 2006 is not simply the land capture, but systematic, prudent step which has been thought over, probably, not only by Tatars, but their abroad advisers. If before the program of arrangement could be closed, so in connection with this new wave the new formal reason for its continuation and creation of a new round of the conflicts is created.

Open data testify to that arrangement was almost complete by then. For example, providing with gas of areas of compact accommodation of the Crimean Tatars (self-captures) in a rural zone in 1989-1993 was twice higher, than in other settlements of the Crimea. For example, there is a village in which only three streets are provided with gas, and these streets are seized by Tatars in 1993. In other settlement the Chernobyl veterans who have received the land, carried out the gas to themselves for some years later than the Tatars who have carried out the self-capture. And they paid nothing for it. And the people, having merits before society and the state looked how on that party they conduct gas on behalf of the state on a national sign, on self-capture which is legalized. Or, for example, the residential district “Alchak” near Sudak. There is a self-capture - 130 houses are built on the taken sites. Before legalization the electricity was got to all these houses. Already there is a gas and water, and documents for legalization did backdating.

Once I studied electricity consumption questions in Yevpatoria. 10 years ago there were shutdowns. On the average one Tatar house in the settlement “Ismail-bey” consumed in the winter 2300 kW a month, in summer 700 kW. Having only 1000 houses they consumed the sixth part of all electric power of the city, taking into account the industrial enterprises, the seaport, all objects of life support of Yevpatoria in which there live 120 thousand people. About 4, 9 thousand Tatars live there. I.e. making 3% from the city population, they consumed 15% of its electric power, i.e. in 5 times more than other citizens.

Thus, the arrangement of the Crimean Tatars is already almost complete and in some areas has the level even above an average. But the Majlis continues to broadcast that the Crimean Tatars aren't equipped and it is necessary to protect their rights. Therefore today the arrangement of Tatars is not the economic, but the political and even a geopolitical problem, argument and bugaboo for achievement of definite purposes.

The government both Ukrainian and local refuses in the beginning, but then legalizes these self-captures. Soon some more one thousand hectares will be now legalized. There will be a geodetic binding of these residential districts further. They are already ideally divided. Economic intelligence perfectly works for Majlis - in Republican committee on land resources there was a deputy whom called “major Melnichenko”. He carried them the maps with communications. Therefore Tatars sit down on self-captures where it is most favourable to be legalized. These actions have no spontaneous, protest character at all- all of them are thought deeply over both on time and on the territory. With rare exception, they are always carried out either on the southern coast of the Crimea or round Simferopol.

Thus, the creation of new “era” of arrangement is observed. This year they can receive the decision on the state act. Next year they will issue these acts. And they live, naturally, not there, but on early captures of the 80-90th years where everything is arranged already well. Then they will shout - we have no gas, electricity, roads, gardens, schools, hospitals. And funds for all this will pull from the state. And after that a half of sites sooner or later will sell by means of various schemes, for example, “concessions”.

These aggressors have huge resources. We counted how many building materials now lie on self-captures. The building materials round Simferopol is on 10 million dollars. They should be bought, brought, and they should be risked. After all theoretically the militiamen can take all these building materials suddenly. They risk for years - put in 2006 and 7 years they are there. They can't be brought from 10 sites in one house. But this place which they staked out for further realization.

Land is an irreplaceable resource. And me as to the inhabitant of the Crimea as the civil activist of the Crimea is not that offensive. And not that the multimillion resources will be and plundered already out from other more actual problems on this arrangement, the half of which would be stolen by the same contractors from among the Crimean Tatars. It is not this most terrible, but that the part of these means, except simply theft, goes on that the Majlis “sharpened knifes” on our children. The Majlis forms a negative concerning the Russian population of the Crimea from the Crimean Tatars, mobilizing and raising their passionarity in the aggressive direction. And under this activity they receive means, including thanks to the Kiev management, by theft, resale of the land, theft of resources from funds for arrangement. And the part of these resources goes not simply on accumulation of personal riches, but the considerable part of means goes on those Wahhabites, extremists, on those sects which form object of attack, an image of the enemy from the Slavic population.

All observe rigidity and confrontation strengthening between Tatar and non Tatar communities as a whole across the Crimea and on the concrete settlement and regions. And the fault to everything is Majlis, the illegal organization which forms schemes of capture of the land, “kickback” of money for arrangement and the scheme of accumulation of these illegal means for the illegal activity and implementation of this confrontation.

Repeatedly I publicly declared that Majlis is an organized criminal group, all members of Majlis are extremists who provoke the Crimean society to the local and general conflicts, intimidate the non Tatar population by the Tatar threat. They substitute the Tatar population under the reciprocal conflict, involve here the international forces from “blue helmets” till OSCE mission, form the changeful idea of all-civil society of Ukraine and the Crimea in the West, form false representation about itself as about victims of genocide or persecuted community.

Thus, they deceive and spin the western community on money, intimidate the Ukrainian establishment with the same purpose and delay resources from crucial issues. But nobody pays attention to all these arguments because it isn't favourable neither to Kiev, nor to the West which actively use this situation in the political and geopolitical goals.

Read us in Telegram

Viewed : 3139   Commented: 0

Author: Mikhail Mikhaylov

Publication date : 17 May 2013 01:00

Source: The world and we