Who actually organized the acts of terrorism on September 11, 2001?
On Wednesday it is 12 years from the date of the whole series of large acts of terrorism in the USA. It is some versions of their origin.
“The recipe of the solution of problems at the West is always one – the war. And the USA started preparing the war 12 years ago”
The official version of “Washington regime” says that some tens bearded Mujahideens, hiding in caves of Afghanistan, developed and then carried out the most difficult jeweler operation on capture of planes and crashed on them into skyscrapers and the Pentagon building. The version is beautiful and clear, if not a set of disagreements in it. And if not the physics law.
So what occurred on September 11, 2001? Let's remember.
Before passing to details of that tragic day, it would be desirable to tell some words about a condition of world economy. Difficulties in it began not yesterday, not in 2008.
The problems of financially focused economic system invisibly smoldered already in the late nineties as if a fire on the peat field burning under a surface of the earth. And if for the general public “fire” escaped on a surface and became visible quite recently, so the problem was visible to world political elite very long time ago.
I will tell more – Gorbachev's treachery rescued “world economy” from crash. Inflation which in the 70th years was TWO-DIGIT in the USA, demonstrated – the patient has a heat. Temperature is high. If Mikhail Gorbachev wouldn’t destroy the USSR, the western economy would fall into a today's corkscrew in the late eighties. But it is by the way.
The recipe of the solution of problems at the West is always one – the war. And the USA started preparing the war 12 years ago. And what is necessary for global war? The global occasion is necessary. Global provocation. And here it happened on September 11, 2001.
What was a plan? As a fuse of the new world conflict the organizations of Islamic radicals were planned who were grown by States during the Afghan war against the Soviet army. After large-scale acts of terrorism of 2001 Washington in the same way precisely “knew” who is guilty. Equally as today the United States precisely “know” that the chemical weapon in Syria was applied by Bashar Assad.
For us a key question is where was planned to begin the war. The answer is such – near us, at us, with our direct broadest participation. For recovery of world economy its owners were going (again already!) to start up the big blood. Where? It doesn’t matter where. The main thing is that it would be much.
Therefore Russia-USSR also appeared in a cross of the largest military conflicts that we have a lot of this blood. Therefore world backstage so likes to let it to us.
In 2001 still the conflict in Chechnya smoldered to the utmost, it was restless in Central Asia. What did Russia make? We pushed out instability for borders of the country. And war didn't come to us. And its organizers had to begin it anew, preparing under the base of its beginning already Middle East.
Blossoming of career of Ramzan Kadyrov who brought an order to native Chechnya by an iron hand, meant a decline of career of Mubarak and Muammar Gaddafi. It is not the paradox, it is the world geopolitics.
And now, with today's understanding of a situation, it is worth returning to the facts about events on September 11, 2001. Here the fragment of my book “Cherchez la Oil”.
“At first we will refresh the event of those of days in memory. Four passenger “Boeing” within an hour were captured by 19 Arab terrorists armed with knives for cutting of a cardboard. Pilots- suicide bombers assumed the steering of planes and changed a course to New York and Washington. Two “Boeings” were sent to twin towers of the World Trade Center.
The fire began in skyscrapers which has caused their final fracture. Third “Boeing" crashed into the Pentagon. Passengers of the fourth plane entered the fight against car thieves that led to a plane crash in the State of Pennsylvania. Such is the standard version of events. It was finally issued within several days after accident, having become the official.
And now we will remember the most scandalous disagreements of this version. Let's begin with the most little-known.
1. On September 11, 2001 three buildings, but not two failed in New York. The death of the third skyscraper is carefully suppressed. The official governmental commission created on events on September 11, didn't include this fact in the report at all. There are two reasons – this building was the New York headquarters of CIA, tax service, the commission on the exchanges and securities, and also the operational center and the bunker of the New York city hall on emergency situations.
And the main thing – no flying object crashed a 47-storeyed skyscraper known as the building No. 7 of the World Trade Center, close to the twin towers. But the building unexpectedly failed about 17 p.m. on September 11, 2001. And nobody suffered at its destruction. No person. Thus the house collapsed “in a form” absolutely as well as towers into which “Boeings” crashed.
2. Designers of the destroyed building unanimously say that the option of hit of the plane was considered at construction and therefore couldn't lead to such consequences. Destruction of towers was surprisingly uniform, symmetric and absolute. Huge skyscrapers accurately broke as if houses of cards. Collapsed completely, having turned into a lot of garbage and a dust cloud – even without the remains of vertical steel columns. So beautifully and correctly houses broke only at the directed explosion applied at demolition of buildings which has served the term. Its implementation doesn't require a lot of explosive, but it needs to be placed in the right places (in direct contact with structural elements) and to undermine in strict synchronized sequence.
3. The plane crashed into the Northern tower at 8.45 at right angle and theoretically could damage the bearing steel support of the building located on the center. At 9.03 the second blow to the Southern tower was struck, but collision happened at an acute angle, so, fragments of the plane shouldn't have touched the bearing.
Meanwhile, despite a difference in the damages, both towers “broke” absolutely symmetrically, floors accurately “collapsed” as happens in cases of controlled demolition of skyscrapers. And the first – at 9.59 – less damaged Southern tower fell and at 10.29 failed the Northern which received more serious damages. And at 17.00 – the third into which nobody crashed in general.
4. The official explanation of a collapse – burning fuel melted the steel columns. Temperature of melting of steel is 1538 °C. There were 200 thousand tons of steel in each of towers. And all this weight was warmed and melted from fuel from fuel tanks of one plane? After all and the amount of fuel got to towers was different– if the first plane flew inside, the part of fuel of the second blew up by huge fiery spheres out of the building that is perfectly visible on records and photos. Towers are identical, quantity of steel in them is identical, the quantity of fuel from planes is different, style of falling and destruction is identical. And the first falls the building which had less fuel?
5. The maximum temperature which is reached when the pure aviation fuel burn is 825 °C. Not only kerosene burned in a tower, but also everything that could burn. Temperature had to decrease from it, instead of raise. Possibility of fires, naturally, is considered at design of buildings. The maximum temperature for unprotected steel designs during test fires (in Great Britain, Japan, the USA and Australia) was 360 °C.
Did the terrorists really cancelled the laws of physics and managed to melt steel at smaller temperature than it is necessary? Or inexplicably raised it to the necessary 1538 °C? One of the American researchers of secret September 11 J. McMichael writes about it: “Application of aviation fuel for melting of steel is an amazing opening, the word of honor...
Specialists in processing of metal potter with acetylene torches, oxygen in cylinders, electric arches from generators, electric furnaces and other difficult devices but what these ingenious terrorists used? Kerosene at worth of 80 cents for gallon at market prices”.
6. According to the official version, hundreds thousands tons of steel melted in a terrible fire, hundreds tons of concrete turned into a dust. Nothing remained from passengers of “Boeing”, only the charred body fragments. Meanwhile the passport of one of car thieves of the plane crashing into a tower, Mohammed Atta (Mohammed Atta), planned down and was found at investigation.
7. Still there is no answer to a question why twin towers didn't fall to pieces, but broke up, having turned into a dust. If the fire caused a building collapse, unevenness of damages and unevenness of burning in different parts of buildings would lead to that the collapse would go in own way in each of buildings. Then pieces of concrete and steel beams would scatter on the big territory, having caused huge damage and having led to numerous victims among inhabitants. It didn't occur. Large fragments as it usually happens didn't appear.
8. According to the official version, the third of the skyjacked planes, “Boeing 757” of the American Airlines (AA) company, flight 77, crashed into the Pentagon. To cause the maximum damage, car thieves directed the plane on a horizontal trajectory. That is tried “to drive” to the building as though they were by car, instead of by plane. The height of “Boeing 757” is 13 meters, the Pentagon – 24 meters. That is the height of flight of the liner had to make literally some meters over the earth that is improbably difficult maneuver.
Why was it necessary to do? Considerably the bigger damage could be caused, having simply brought down the plane from above on the building. Thus it is difficult to miss – the Pentagon occupies the space of 117 363 square meters. Terrorists choose the most difficult and less effective option. Thus, flying in several meters over the earth, the plane broke the wires stretched through the street. But somehow managed to squeeze between columns the distance between which is less than wingspan of “Boeing 757”.
9. Any person seeing at least once the plane knows that at its horizontal collision with the building, inevitably there would be damages on the last – both from the body and from wings. However the American investigators weren't confused by that fact that, judging by photos about accident sites, “Boeing 757” before collision accurately put wings as there were no traces from wings on the building of the Pentagon. It wasn't revealed any fragments of the plane in the Pentagon. According to the official version, all details “disappeared” during a fire, as well as steel support of towers of the World Trade Center.
Meanwhile in each of plane crashes which were endured by mankind, everything never burned down without the rest. For example, when “Concorde” near Paris crashed into hotel right after take-off, it was filled with kerosene, but there were a lot of fragments.
There were no any fragments on a lawn before a place of blow of the plane to the building. And after all the wings had to break off from the blow and their fragments together with heavy engines and part of a tail would be visible directly on an accident site. But it isn't visible any small screw near fire trucks which could testify that the plane crashed into the Pentagon.
The wall in which, according to the official version, the plane crashed, didn't stay too long. Though it simply couldn't remain at collision with the plane the minimum speed of which is about 400 km per hour. But the wall remained and stood, while the firefighters extinguished a fire. The entrance opening was remarkably visible on it, the accessory of which only the three-year-old child could attribute to the plane. And from above over a place where the huge plane crashed, in several meters the whole windows in which even glasses are broken not completely are visible. Therefore the external wall of the Pentagon “failed” through a couple of hours after attack.
10. Destructions of two twin towers were caused as the official version claims, by spill of fuel and a terrible fire. However there are no traces of burning of kerosene on a grass before the Pentagon. Lawn was quite green. Meanwhile there was a strong explosion of fuel to formation of fiery spheres out of the building at plane blow in the second tower. Nobody saw something similar in the Pentagon. And the destructions of this building were incomparably less catastrophic than turned out from the same blow in New York.
11. The government of the USA declared that passengers and the crew members who were onboard of flight 77, were identified on DNA remains. After the fire which has destroyed 100 tons of aviation aluminum without a trace, internal and external finishing of the liner?
12. Despite the remained by miracle “DNA remains”, the black boxes of all planes, according to the official version, burned down. Similar devices practically in all plane crashes remain and their records decipher and study.
13. The fourth seized plane of United Airlines (flight UA93) crashes near the city Shanksville in the State of Pennsylvania at 10.37 a.m., almost in two hours after it took off from the airport. According to the official version, passengers of this plane entered the fight against car thieves and didn't allow them to carry out conceived (blow to the White House).
As a result of fight of terrorists and passengers the plane fell. However some fragments of the plane were found at distance to eight miles from an accident site, in inhabited quarters. Many inhabitants of the region Indian Lake reported about on a silver platter flaring fragments of the plane.
14. More than 250 people were the passengers of four seized planes. They managed to make 13 calls to the family directly from a board. It is improbable. In 2001 the probability of successful connection from the cell phone from the jet airliner flying at a huge speed and height, was close to zero. Only in 2004-2005 a number of the companies was engaged in development of the equipment for providing stable mobile communication in airliners – “Boeing” and “Airbus”.
The probability to phone at decrease of the plane also is smallest. At smaller height the jet plane leaves the limits of one honeycombs within 1–8 seconds. During this time the phone manages to come into contact with it, however it is already in a zone of another honeycombs. Conversation inevitably interrupts, without having begun.
But if it was impossible to phone from a board of the plane, so how the relatives of victims could identify their voice on an answering machine? There is an answer to this question too. Recently in Russia there was a new type of fraud. Swindlers call home and say to relatives of any person that he got to militia (for road accident, fight, etc.) and the money is required to rumple an unpleasant situation. In order the victim didn't doubt, a tube is given to “victim”, but literally on couple of seconds and he manages to tell some words.
The essence is that all victims of swindlers hear the voices of the relatives being in absolutely other place, and obediently give the money. Not the parodists and handymen speak by phone – swindlers call on simple base of numbers and can't know a timbre of a voice and feature of conversation of the unknown person. And relatives hear what they “want” to hear...
In materials of investigation there is a text of one of the taken place call. Mark Bingham calls the mother and speaks: “Hi, mother, it is me – Mark Bingham”...
15. None of the people of the seized planes who have called from a board didn't tell in one of alleged telephone conversations that the car thieves were of the Arab origin. Nobody told the simple and important phrase in such conditions: “Arabs seized our plane”.
16. U.S. President George Bush not only long rejected the invitation to address members of the commission on investigation of events on September 11, but also, having already agreed on a meeting, exposed the conditions.
– He insisted on the conversation limited on time – one hour.
– The head of the USA agreed to give evidences only together with the vice-president – Dick Cheney.
– Thus there have to be only two persons from the commission – the chairman and his deputy.
After difficult negotiations the party agreed that conversation will take place in the White House, and all 10 members of the commission will participate in it. A limit on time was lifted too. It would seem, the commission will be able to receive exhaustive information from the president. However not everything is so simple. For receiving approval of Bush it was necessary to agree on this “conversation” that:
– it won't be conducted neither video, nor audio recordings, even shorthand reports;
– thus neither Bush, nor Cheney shouldn't have accepted the oath.
It isn't known to this day what the heads of the USA told the congressmen, though “conversation” took place in April, 2004. To understand the absurdity of such situation, imagine that the witness is called in court, but he agrees to speak only in the presence of other witness. What for? To hear his indications and to avoid different interpretations. Then indications of the witness are coded. And the most important – nobody obliged him to tell the truth, after all the witness didn't accept the oath...
There is an official version of the American government, there are facts disproving it. We obviously get to know the truth at a distant day. I am excited by one question.
What became with passengers of the plane allegedly attacking the Pentagon if according to all calculations this blow was made not by “Boeing 757”?
Viewed : 3388 Commented: 1
Author: Blog of Nikolay Starikov
Publication date : 13 September 2013 01:00
Source: The world and we
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),15)||'
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
pyRg80CW')) OR 64=(SELECT 64 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
XyZMzDFV') OR 243=(SELECT 243 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
P4LptCyz' OR 887=(SELECT 887 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
nLVVxcLY'; waitfor delay '0:0:15' --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
1 waitfor delay '0:0:15' --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
(select(0)from(select(sleep(9.354)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(9.354)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(9.354)))v)+"*/
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR"Z
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR'Z
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0)
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1" OR 3+368-368-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1" OR 2+368-368-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1' OR 3+972-972-1=0+0+0+1 or 'KmHBGl1R'='
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1' OR 2+972-972-1=0+0+0+1 or 'KmHBGl1R'='
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1' OR 3+792-792-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1' OR 2+792-792-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1 OR 2+30-30-1=0+0+0+1
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1 OR 3+30-30-1=0+0+0+1
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1 OR 3+347-347-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1 OR 2+347-347-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa