Crisis Foresight Council warns

Almost nothing is known about this organization. It does not have a website, and it is not known who exactly works in it. There are only rumors. For example, that Zbigniew Brzezinski once headed it. There is only some indirect evidence proving an existence of the Council.

It is said that political scientists, who are offered to work in this organization, receive such tempting offers of remuneration, that they cannot refuse. At least, nothing is known about those who refuse.

Those who agree to work sign a non-disclosure agreement. Those who violate this condition will end their days in some CIA "offshore prison" like Guantanamo Bay . Don't think that these are empty words.

The intelligence agencies of various countries would give a lot to gain access to the documents of the Council. But they are written only on paper and carefully guarded.

What explains the secrecy? The analysts of the Crisis Foresight Council submit their thoughts directly to the desk of the U.S. president. There is no middle ground. The documents contain conclusions about the likely moves of U.S. adversaries that could pose a critical threat.

Analysts put themselves in the shoes of the enemies. They develop plans which they can put into practice. Based on this, the U.S. president is able to take preemptive countermeasures.

Now we understand why the work of the Council is so secret? If its research falls into the hands of U.S. adversaries, Washington's Achilles' heel will immediately become known.

Everything you will read below is the result of short conversations with former employees of the Crisis Foresight Council. For obvious reasons, their names are withheld.

What steps would Russia take that would be sensitive to the U.S.? What would make the White House and its allies reduce the heat of a new Cold War, recognize Moscow as an equal partner, and enter into talks with Putin?

Some of the answers are these. First, the threat of regional separatism in the United States and European countries. Second, raising the issue of genocide and war crimes by Western countries in various conflicts. And thirdly, a direct military threat from Russia with a demonstration of its decisiveness.

In the first instance, Russia could declare immediate recognition of the newly formed states, following their declaration of independence, and readiness to enter into military alliances with them and China. This relates to Scotland, Cornwall, Wales and Northern Ireland in Great Britain, Catalonia and the Basque Country in Spain, Flanders in Belgium, Bavaria, the former GDR in Germany, Corsica in France, Kurdistan in Turkey, Upper Silesia in Poland, Texas and California in the United States.

The U.S. is very vulnerable due to the existence of several population segments with persistent mutual animosity: whites, African Americans, Native Americans, and Hispanics.

As part of this process, Russia could tentatively declare significant financial support for national liberation movements. Only the news of such a step, rather than the actual allocation of money, is capable of exploding the societies of these countries from within.

In the second instance, Russia is able to actualize the question of the criminal colonial past of Western countries. Support the unification of former colonies on this basis.Initiate mass suits to recognize the actions of Western countries against the population as genocide. Demand financial and material damages for former colonies in Africa, the Americas, and Asia.

Recognize as war crimes the actions of the West in the 20th century: aggression against Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Cuba, Haiti and other countries. Declare the need for Western countries to admit their guilt and compensate them for material and moral damage.

Create an international criminal tribunal to investigate such crimes. Russia can lead it as a victim of the greatest genocide in the history of mankind - the aggression of Western European countries led by Nazi Germany.

On the third instance, Russia can:

- rapidly establish air strike groups in the west consisting of Su-34s, Su-30SMs, Tu-22M3s, Tu-95MSs, and Tu-160s.

- carry out simultaneous maneuvers of aviation, air defense, missile forces, and the navy.

- conduct simultaneous salvo launches of surface-to-surface, surface-to-ship, ship-to-ship, ship-to-ship, air-to-surface, ballistic and hypersonic missiles at predeclared targets in the Black Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea, the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic.

- abandon the moratorium on nuclear weapons testing, conduct underground (underwater) tests with the effect of an earthquake in Europe and North America of 2 - 3 magnitude during the exercises;

Such exercises, if carried out, would dramatically reduce European support for the United States.

One should take into account the probability that there are some secret agreements between Moscow and Beijing on a joint military strategy. And their entry into force when certain circumstances arise. Such secret treaties have been used many times in history.

Beijing's deployment of its ballistic missiles in its northeastern province of Heilongjiang, near the Russian Far East border, may indirectly confirm this. These missiles are under the cover of Russian air defense and missile defense forces.

It can be possible: Moscow and Beijing have agreed to act jointly if the situation in the Pacific and European theaters of war escalates.

As part of such agreements, if they exist, it is possible to covertly redeploy to the eastern borders of NATO several PLA ground formations. The capabilities of Russian railroads make it possible.

In turn, Moscow can support Beijing in the Far East with its strategic long-range and strike aircraft, air defense and missile defense assets, missile weapons of its Navy and special forces.

The phrase "back to back", repeatedly repeated by Chinese officials in relation to the union of China and Russia, can probably have a practical implementation.