How to return the Russianness to Ukraine
Last parliamentary elections once again confirmed how our society split and, despite the efforts undertaken by regionals on “sewing together” of artificially created country, this split continues to be aggravated. In its basis there is the opposition of two mutually exclusive beginnings – integration idea of the Russian unity within the Russian civilization and isolationist ideology of ukrainstvo with it primitive idea of “the unique Ukrainian nation” and aspiration to rank itself as European civilization. Civilization incompatibility developed into two Ukraines not stopping fight, one of which looks to the east and another to the west.
In this opposition the forces are far not equal, on the party of the first it is the aspiration of the people to keep the national consciousness which isn't relying on a little significant political forces, on the party of the second all power of the state led by ruling class. With active support of the state the ideology of an ukrainstvo in the form of a creeping ukrainization slowly extends everything further to the east and gets here the new supporters and ideas of the Russian unity gradually lose the positions.
Supporters of the Russian unity predictably lost these elections and received simply pejorative result absolutely not corresponding to support of these ideas among the population and especially in the Southeast. Any their party didn't come nearer to the access barrier and any of majority members unless Markov from Odessa didn't pass in parliament.
It is the time to ask a question what occurs and why the population doesn't wish to support the political forces resisting to an ukrainstvo with such persistence. In the answer to it first of all it is necessary to explain, on the one hand, why the political class of Ukraine made an ukrainstvo as the national and state ideology, on the other hand, whether to understand are there political forces in general capable really to defend the values of the Russian unity and on what ideological bases they lean.
How the ukrainstvo became the national and state ideology
About an ukrainstvo origin, as well as for what purpose it appeared and why it was based on statehood of Ukraine is written already much and it is fullest and reasoned stated in Andrey Vadzhra's article “Russia anti-Russian and the new imperial project”.
Let's allocate the main thing that is the essence of ukrainstvo and the reasons for which it became the national and state ideology of Ukraine. Ukrainstvo is a core of the political Ukraina project started by the West at the end of the XIX century for the purpose of destruction of unity of the Russian people, alteration of the Russian population of the South Western Russia in non-Russian “nation of Ukrainians” and creation of the anti-Russian state resisting to Russia.
For this project the Austrian Galicia was chosen as the base where it was succeeded to change mentality and traditions Rusyns and to create Galician “Ukrainians” at whom the hatred to all Russian was initially put. The idea of “Ukrainian nation” consists in continuous fight against Russia for the independent existence and one of its fundamental meanings is the aspiration to leave further from Russia as it is possible. For this purpose there were the constant radical withdrawal pains of the Russian national identity of the people of Ukraine and imposing to it the anti-Russian ideology of an ukrainstvo.
With Union disorder, the local Ukrainian elite, having seized the power, decided to keep the territory, resources and the population of the Soviet Ukraine under the control at any cost for the purpose of personal enrichment. For justification of the power it was required an ukrainstvo with the pathological aspiration to lose contact with Russia which began to be imposed to the population already as the national and state ideology.
Considering that the West is the main guarantor of saving of the Ukraina project and consequently also the authorities of ruling elite, the foreign policy of the state was and remains unambiguously westernized, focused on European integration and rapprochement with the United States.
All this is proved by the mass of historical documents and investigated by historians in detail. But such unattractive history of emergence of “Ukrainian nation” carefully disappears from society and for cover of the truth the false version about “unique Ukrainian nation” is started based on mystification, a perversion of historic facts and fantastic fictions.
According to this version since ancient times there were ancient Ukrainian people with rich history, princely dynasties from a family tree from Ryurik dynasty, the first Ukrainian state Kievan Rus', “the Cossack republic” on Dnepr, it had a constitution of hetman Orlik for the first time in the world and there were fighters for freedom of the people in the person of Mazepa and Bandera and that “angry Russians” destroyed the Ukrainian statehood of times of civil war.
Thus forget to say that the ancient Ukrainian people never existed in the history ,that Old Russian Kievan Rus' together with the Russian princes was compelled to go to Vladimir and Moscow after Tatar riots, that there was not a republic, but a gang of robbers trading in a robbery and a slave trade on Sech, that “first constitution” never existed and Orlik never was a hetman, that Mazepa was the perjurer and Bandera was the sadist and the bandit, that “operetta states” of the times of civil war kept on bayonets of Germans, the Austrians and Poles. Very entertaining and mythical history turns out at never existing “Ukrainian nation”.
The ideological basis is put under all this historical nonsense in the form of an ukrainstvo, proving that only ethnic by birth “Ukrainians” always lived there and this earth belongs only to them, that they have nothing in common with the Russian people and always sought to create the state and aggressive neighbours, constantly oppressing such proud and freedom-loving people, didn't allow the statehood of Ukraine. For the purpose of justification of the isolation from the Russian civilization, the myth about “imperial Russia” and its “fifth column” of the Ukrainian Russians, seeking to destroy the Ukrainian statehood takes root, for protection from which all people should unite. Most convinced “Ukrainians” go further away and prove that the Ukrainian state will prosper if to expel all alien people from it.
The Ukrainian elite also brings also the contribution, cynically covering the aspirations to leave under the European umbrella with the fairy tale about “European choice” where we will happily begin to live, have paradise and strong Europe will protect us from invasion of “barbarians” from Russia.
This ideology naturally came from Galicia which really was oppressed for centuries, but not by the Russian, but the Polish and Austrian enslavers. Being the backward periphery of Europe presented besides generally by the country population, they didn't influence its development in any way and so remained not Europeans dreaming of the state of which never had. Nevertheless for many centuries of staying in the European civilization they became the part of the European cultural space and they created the Galician national identity which they seek to extend to all population of Ukraine.
So the Galician ethnic nationalism became the national and state ideology and the etnocratic state of “Ukrainians” with the system of values and one state-building Ukrainian ethnos is under construction under it. It got the state symbolic, the flag was presented by the Austrians, the anthem was thought up by Poles, the state language is introduced under the decree of the Austrian parliament, and nobody can explain an origin of the coat of arms. The most interesting thing that all these attributes of statehood came to Ukraine from Galicia so it fairly apply for “brain of the Ukrainian nation”, what nation such is a brain.
At all wretchedness such national and state ideology has the right to existence and finds support at part of the population, especially at the lower class. Besides it is a stay core of the Ukrainian elite in power which reduces the national interests to preservation in this type of statehood in the mercenary purposes at any cost.
All power of the state is directed on realization of these postulates in life and any Ukrainian power standing on these principles will do everything possible and also impossible not to allow their destruction. In spite of the fact that according to article 15 of the Constitution any ideology can admit the state as obligatory, the total ideological dictatorship of ethnonationalism imposed to all society is established in the country.
Naturally the state with such ideological basis can support the nationalist forces and movements, as there are for the whole years of independence of Ukraine. In the beginning there was a RUH, then the orange came and now the regionals, losing the power, purposefully prepare Svoboda as fighting group of fight for the Ukrainian statehood already with frank Nazi ideology. Also it isn't excluded that sometime the regionals and members of Svoboda will defend the ideas of the etnocratic state in common under uniform banners.
So, speaking about ideology of an ukrainstvo it is possible to note that for years of independence it became the national and state ideology with the system of values, the elite and political parties are created for its advance, well debugged system of ideological impact on the population is created and a main objective of ruling elite is the further distance from the Russian world and aspiration to leave under protection of European civilization. All this says that any political force defending the Russian unity will inevitably face the powerful counteraction of the state for the purpose of prevention of destruction of ideology of an ukranstvo as bases of statehood of Ukraine.
Condition of the “pro-Russian” political forces
Let's look what organizationally and ideologically resists to this harmonious state system of introduction of ideology of ethnic nationalism in consciousness of citizens and suppression of any manifestations of the Russian unity destroying the state foundations of Ukraine.
Let's begin with political forces. By whom are they presented? There are no political parties more or less known in the Ukrainian society defending the Russian unity, any of them was never presented in parliament and didn't gather nearly more than one percent of votes on all elections. I can be objected that under such slogans there was Vitrenko's party, but it isn't necessary to forget that it is the Party of progressive socialists which has broken away from socialists with the pronounced communistic orientation, skilfully operating the ideals of the Russian unity.
Further the whole galaxy of so-called “pro-Russian” parties follows behind which it is possible to except the names and ambitions of their leaders. The known Russian Block party in narrow circles, as if defending the interests of the Russians in Ukraine, created once by Svistunov and taken away from him by more successful colleagues. The Rus party not so long ago being called as the Russian-Ukrainian Union, created by the former deputy of parliament Ivan Simonenko and taken away or bought from him by Shevchyuk for satisfaction of the nationalist complexes. There is even more ridiculous Slavic party which has got to Luzan from fragments of the Civil congress of Ukraine, really applying at the beginning of the 90th on party of the Russian unity and disorganized by party members. The Homeland party existing only in Odessa region and several regions of the Crimea, created by Markov under the Russian slogans for advance of the business interests in Odessa. There is nothing to remember other same parties. All these “pro-Russian” parties have nothing except authorized documents, the seal, the registration in Ministry of Justice and at the best several tens party members, they were and remain the outcasts who aren't influencing political processes in the country in any way. There are also some hundred same marginal public organizations of the so-called “pro-Russian” orientation, the heads of which fight among themselves for the right to represent the interests of the Russians in Ukraine and to be treated kindly by the officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia.
The All-Ukrainian Coordination Council of the Organizations of the Russian Compatriots headed by well-known regional Kolesnichenko is created at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Russia, the views and actions of which cause far not unambiguous reaction. This organization already causes rejection of many people in Ukraine by the name as it is directed not on support of the Russians, but the “Russian” compatriots that at once cuts a great number of the Russians on spirit of the people identifying with the state of Ukraine for various reasons. The most interesting is that this structure managed to take so marginal organizations under control that even nobody heard their names and it would be better not to remember the surnames of some heads.
Here such “terrible” force as though resists to well organized and financed by the state campaign for introduction of ideology of an ukrainstvo. It is not enough that organizationally they represent nothing from themselves, ideologically they are the full impotent, very originally representing the idea of the Russian unity and owing to the understanding trying to fight for its realization in life. For what they fight and what purposes put? The set of requirements doesn't shine with originality and it is quite simple. It is the fight for the rights of the Russians in Ukraine, for the second state Russian language, for association with Russia, for creation of the Russian state in Ukraine, for Slavic unity and some other less significant requirements of the same orientation.
At all relevance of brought-up questions there is no an ideological basis, there is no that system of values for which it is necessary to fight and which are capable to interest the society. Put-forward offers cover separate aspects of requirements of ethnic Russians for the rights in the Ukrainian state. What they differ? All these requirements are of any part of society, even the big, but the part far not prevailing. They can be not such significant for other society, but for the separate layers even sharing ideas of the Russian unity, they can be essentially unacceptable.
That is, there is no harmonious system of opinions on the future of the Ukrainian state. And if it so, so it is almost impossible to get support of the majority of the population and to affect policy of the state with such ideas. Therefore, there have to be other purposes and ideas which seize the masses and move them on resolute actions. Before starting to discuss a problem of creation of political power of the Russian unity it is necessary to understand accurately what purposes are put before it, for what it has to fight, what ideology to profess and on what sectors of society to lean.
Ideological bases of the Russian unity
Today's opposition in society is caused not by class or social contradictions, but in many respects civilization at the heart of which is the civilization self-identification of the different people of Ukraine where the majority carries themselves to the Russian and Galicia to European civilization. Therefore, this opposition is caused by the fight of two national ideologies acting as an ideological and spiritual basis of national self-identification.
One of the defining reasons which have led to marginalization of the Russian movement in Ukraine is the absence of the powerful ideological project capable to resist to an ukrainstvo as an equal. It is well known that it is possible to win against ideology only with the help of other ideology and no criticism without the offers of alternative ways of society development can stop the ideology of ukrainstvo which have already seized by the masses, based on separatism from the Russian world and the “Galician-Ukrainian” identity, having become the national and state ideology, over time seized the considerable number of our fellow citizens and continues to win the new supporters. Only the purposeful dethronement and opposition of ideology of the Russian unity to it can stop it, based absolutely on other national identity.
That is, the destruction of ideological bases of the Ukrainian statehood and a dethronement of myths of an ukrainstvo on which the national and state ideology is based has to precede the ideological and organizational beginnings of the Russian movement. It isn't so difficult to do it as there is no historical basis under all this fantastic mythology and it is constructed on primitive fictions, glorification of the defeats and glorification of mean Mazepa-Bandera treachery.
What purposes have to be put before the political force, seeking to revive the Russian unity and what has to occur in Ukraine as a result of its actions? The answer to this question is actual also as after Union disintegration before the Russian movement in Ukraine the false targets were set directed on upholding of the rights of the Russians in this state and picked up by “professional Russians” on illiteracy. The contribution was brought also by illiterate policy of the officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia who has conceived to defend the interests of even not Russians, but the Russian compatriots with the help of All-Ukrainian Coordination Council of the Organizations of the Russian Compatriots. Thereby it was underlined that the fight is conducted not for the people and the state of Ukraine, but for the Russian diaspora presented by ethnic Russians.
With the help of such actions the Russian movement rolls down to ethnic nationalism, which isn't differ from the Ukrainian and, considering that the last one unsuccessfully spread more than hundred years on low-Russian lands, it will be very difficult to win against it in such situation. Having set such purpose before itself, the movement appears in a losing situation at once as recognizes that defends the interests not all society but only its parts and becomes in confrontation with other population who consciously or in large part due to a misunderstanding considers themselves as “Ukrainians”.
Therefore the purpose of the Russian movement has to be not the fight for the rights of Russians, but for return of Russianness to the people of Ukraine. Fight for the Russian people not on a nationality what the nationalists achieve and Russians on spirit of any nationality, carrying to Russian cultural people. And such people in Ukraine are the vast majority. This purpose is absolutely another, it is not dividing, but uniting all who wouldn't like the ethnic nationalism under the banners.
We should have some kind of reconquista as the Spaniards had in the Middle Ages when they returned the lands of the Iberian Peninsula seized by Moors to a christian civilization and under the leadership of Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castile who expelled the Arab invaders and returned to the native civilization.
The following much more difficult purpose is the development and justification of national ideology of the Russian unity forming the purposes of national movement and specifying ways and means of their achievement. It is necessary to submit the new ideological project, to formulate the attractive purposes for society, to make them a subject of discussion and to prove the rightness of ideas of the Russian unity.
On the basis of the Russian civilization culture grown by previous generations and covering all spheres of human life, it is necessary to formulate the valuable reference points and the basic values characterizing our civilization.
It will be necessary to answer the questions, what set of values is peculiar to our people, who we are in this world and from where we came, where are our roots, who are our national heroes, friends and foes, what are the national interests and the international priorities. The national ideology of the Russian unity and system of values peculiar to the Russian civilization will give the chance to estimate objectively our past and the present and to develop criteria of making decisions on the future.
Naturally at once there is a question what political nation we are going to create. Naturally we deny the Ukrainian, most likely, in the search of national identity it is necessary to come back to our sources, to remember that these are the lands of Russia where it the beginning of the Russian civilization was started and to create not ethnic, but the political nation of the RUSSIANS, one of the branches of the Russian people, uniting all settled on these lands and dividing values of the Russian world. It is necessary to seek to return the Russian national identity to our people, its primordial name instead of “Ukrainian”, imposed by the foes.
And the state, if it exists, has to be called not from the offensive suburban name thought up by the Poles, but to bear the name of Rus’. Already there are Russia and Belarus and also has to be Rus’ in which the Russian sense and the Russian roots are already initially put.
At realization of ideas of the Russian unity inevitably there is a question of statehood and a place of Ukraine within the Russian civilization. Theoretically everything is probable, but in practice not everything is so simple. Though this prematurely born state also received the state attributes casually as a result of Union disorder, its existence is favourable to many people in the world and it is necessary to reckon with it.
It is more correct to set the purpose to reconstruct this anti-Russian state in essence in its contrast with acceptance of the Russian national and state ideology and its integration into the Customs and Eurasian unions at the first stage. The future will show how steady is this state, its prospects far not iridescent, but existence forms in the Eurasian space can be absolutely different.
Thus it isn't necessary to forget that in this territory there is a malignant tumor in the person of Galicia, to live with which in one state any sane person won’t want. It is impossible to change them, metastasises from them started creeping away over all country and, most likely, all the same it is necessary to get rid of invasion of the Galician barbarians. There is no place for Galicia in the new national project, it has to be put in such conditions under which the distribution of the Nazi ideology even in their den will be impossible. In this case they have to ripen about impossibility of cohabitation and go to free swimming or society will get rid of them some other way.
Dynamics of the Russian unity
Having arguing on promotion of the national project of the Russian unity it is necessary to consider that the attitude towards it in various regions of Ukraine essentially differs, from unconditional support in the east till furious rejection in the West. Last elections once again confirmed the developed polarization of preferences between the East, the centre and the West which were stabilized and practically doesn't change over the years. It can be shown by results of vote in regions for “own” and “others” political forces. If, for example, in Novorossiya 47,59% of voters voted for the Party of Regions, and2,92%, for Svoboda, so in Galicia 5,23% and 35,33% respectively. All this says that the idea of the Russian unity can't seize the minds of citizens over all country at the initial stage, for its successful advance it is necessary to lean on one of regions which becomes basic and where the dynamics, capable to become the carrier of national ideology of Russianness can arise.
The origin of ideology of an ukrainstvo in Galicia can be a bright example for it where the Poles imparted “Ukrainian identity” to the Galician Rusyns, torn off some centuries from the Russian civilization and from where it gradually started extending across all Ukraine.
So the ideology of the Russian unity has to be formed where it is most susceptible and finds a fertile field.
Such region certainly is Novorossiya in nine areas of which the majority of the population always considered themselves as the Russians. These are the lands of the Wild field since the XVIII century developed by administration of the Russian Empire where the Russian cities were under construction and the industry was developed where the people kept the Russian cultural and civilization identity and is ready to defend the rights. Therefore the revival of Russianness has to begin here and it is necessary to form a basis of the Russian movement in Novorossiya, to create the base and a fighting fist for advance of its ideas all over the country.
It would be ridiculous to begin it in Kiev and Lviv where already considerable part of the population is subjected to a nationalist infection. As confirmation one more example from the last elections can be when the publicist Oles Busina, the well-known in the country with anti-Nazi views was a candidate in one of the districts of Kiev and the Nazi from Svoboda practically won him with an enormous separation that once again speaks about very perverted views of the inhabitants of Kiev.
Beginning the fight for restoration of the Russian unity it is necessary to understand that there is the ideological war between an ukrainstvo and Russianness in which there can't be reconciliation and someone will have to leave from a historical scene. Respectively the methods of achievement of the objectives have to be corresponding to military operations.
It is well known that passivity and humility of one of the parties causes the energy inflow in another and strengthens a pressure of the last. The Russian movement for all years of independence constantly lost to the nationalists because of absence of the ideological core relying on ideology of an ukrainstvo and knowing the ultimate goals of creation of the etnocratic state.
Owing to these reasons it constantly justified and was in deaf defence and, as we know, it is impossible to win a victory by this type of conducting actions. Ukrainstvo on the contrary adheres to offensive tactics and wins, insolently and impudently hammering the ideas into the heads of potential allies.
In this regard in advance of ideas of the Russian unity it is necessary to pass from deaf defence to active offensive actions on all fronts and more energetically to defend the values of the Russian world. For the solution of these tasks the population has to be socially active and the toughening of opposition of an ukrainstvo and Russianness can make it such and if the first fights for statehood for the sake of statehood, so the second combats for quality of life of the people on the basis of unity of the Russian civilization.
It is impossible to unite all separate forces resisting to an ukrainstvo and to achieve strategic objectives without the harmonious ideology supported by the majority. The real concept of a social system with a complete frame of reference on our present and the future, based not on historical myths, but on historical regularities of our development is necessary to society. We should fight for souls of our citizens and such concept has to rely on national ideology which ideologically focuses the citizens for realization of goals.
Viewed : 4071 Commented: 0
Author: Yury Apukhtin
Publication date : 10 February 2013 01:00
Source: The world and we
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),15)||'
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
pyRg80CW')) OR 64=(SELECT 64 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
XyZMzDFV') OR 243=(SELECT 243 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
P4LptCyz' OR 887=(SELECT 887 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
nLVVxcLY'; waitfor delay '0:0:15' --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
1 waitfor delay '0:0:15' --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
(select(0)from(select(sleep(9.354)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(9.354)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(9.354)))v)+"*/
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR"Z
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR'Z
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0)
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1" OR 3+368-368-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1" OR 2+368-368-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1' OR 3+972-972-1=0+0+0+1 or 'KmHBGl1R'='
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1' OR 2+972-972-1=0+0+0+1 or 'KmHBGl1R'='
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1' OR 3+792-792-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1' OR 2+792-792-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1 OR 2+30-30-1=0+0+0+1
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1 OR 3+30-30-1=0+0+0+1
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1 OR 3+347-347-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
-1 OR 2+347-347-1=0+0+0+1 --
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa
Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service
e
lxbfYeaa