Prosecutor's office has many questions to Saakashvili and he has one answer: “I won't arrive!”

In Georgia the events round the former president of the country Mikheil Saakashvili which quite approach under the description in a genre of «soap opera» are developed. Plot is plain: the ex-president is invited home that to answer a number of questions which the prosecutor’s office has to him. And he says that sees safety threat in it, but surely will arrive when the democracy again will triumph in Georgia! That is, when he will return to the power again …

The main prosecutor’s office of Georgia has interest to talk to Mikheil Saakashvili not in one occasion: «The consequence on a number of cases is in a final phase, and the prosecutor’s office faces need of interrogation of Mikheil Saakashvili as the witness on these cases». And there are exactly ten cases. Here are they:

- case of death circumstances of the popular politician, prime minister Zurab Zhvania;

- case of illegal actions concerning a family of the businessman Badri Patarkatsishvili, the friend of Boris Berezovsky;

- case of compulsion of owners of Mze and Rustavi-2 TV companies to refuse the share;

- case of waste more than eight million lari which belonged to special service of the state protection;

- case of death circumstances during special operation of one of participants of events on base in Mukhrovani;

- case of transfer for symbolical cost in one lari of the state property worth three million dollars to the founder of TV-25 TV company;

- case upon pardon by the president of the persons condemned for murder of Sandro Ghirgvliani;

- case of attempt to make bankrupt of the bank «Karta»;

- case of waste of the means which was in state ownership of JSC Agrometr;

- case of illegal privatization of state property of JSC Bezeki;
The list impresses. It is not surprise that prosecutors have the questions to Saakashvili. Understanding that the ex-president considers that all people are equal, but some nevertheless more exactly than others, the Main prosecutor’s office of Georgia even suggested him to carry out the interrogation remotely …

The logic was simple: «The main prosecutor’s office suggests Mikheil Saakashvili to carry out interrogation remotely, all doubts concerning its detention will be thereby disseminated». Alas, the expert on democratic standards to which he is ready to teach anyone, this option didn’t arrange.

What was necessary to do to prosecutor’s office? Only publicly to designate the position. It was made by the chief prosecutor of Georgia Georgy Badashvili: «Unfortunately, Mikheil Saakashvili wasn’t on interrogation as the witness in prosecutor’s office, he didn’t fulfill the civic duty. But the consequence will proceed. It isn’t obligatory to interrogate the specific witness — by investigation we will obtain enough evidence that the consequence will give to us the grounds to carry out objectively».

And what about Mikheil Saakashvili? Is he going to explain somehow the unwillingness to arrive home and to answer prosecutor’s office questions? Explains, of course, but does it very willingly — in various mass media.

For a start he declared to popular TV channel «Rustavi-2» that «process is politically motivated, deprived of any justice», and after a meeting with Yulia Timoshenko, probably, having fairly inspired, added: «Apparently they were frightened of the international pressure and changed a form as they were explained well by Europeans and Americans … Let at least will look at Ukraine and on the example of this madam will see, with what the campaigns of this kind and such use of prosecutor’s office come to an end … Come to an end badly».

The Georgian authorities can’t stand aside— they should designate the position publicly too. The prime minister Irakli Garibashvili gave the interview to the Kviris Palette newspaper concerning events round the person Saakashvili, more than once spoke about it publicly. Here what is his position:

- Saakashvili has to give irrefragable answers on all questions, at least to dispel doubts and to help an investigation correctly to conduct the process.

He is simply obliged to arrive as was the president of this country within nine years. Another matter — will he arrive or not. In my opinion, he has to arrive if he while sensibly thinks.

It is usual democratic process. Similar occurs in the heart of Europe: there were questions to the former presidents of France (I mean Sarkozy and Jacques Chirac), and the prime minister of Italy Berlusconi was given seven years of imprisonment … So it is normal process.

Process is normal, but the wisdom formulated by «American friends» which was uttered long ago is known long ago, but all is actual today: «Samos, of course, is the son of a bitch, but is our son of a bitch!» Therefore the reaction of the West to attempts of the Georgian prosecutor’s office to achieve answers to questions from Mikheil Saakashvili, is very indicative. We will listen, for example, that the former Assistant U. S. Secretary of State Matthew Bryza to whom, most likely, recommended speaks to act publicly that then there would be no questions.

Mister Bryza argued that Georgia close approached to that already to receive the Plan of action on membership in alliance at NATO summit in September. But, it appears, there is a problem:
«Because of Mikheil Saakashvili’s call in prosecutor’s office they say that, probably, Georgia doesn’t deserve the Plan as there politically motivated justice and it will be applied selectively».

So, Mikheil Saakashvili can quietly give lectures in the USA and broadcast on the Maidan — there are no problems for him yet — unless, only in two countries. He also told about it: «Today there are two countries, to go in which is a problem for me — the Russian Federation and Georgia» …