« November, 2024 »
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
RECENT COMMENTS

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),15)||'

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

pyRg80CW')) OR 64=(SELECT 64 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

XyZMzDFV') OR 243=(SELECT 243 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

P4LptCyz' OR 887=(SELECT 887 FROM PG_SLEEP(15))--

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

nLVVxcLY'; waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

1 waitfor delay '0:0:15' --

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

(select(0)from(select(sleep(9.354)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(9.354)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(9.354)))v)+"*/

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR"Z

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0))XOR'Z

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(15),0)

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1" OR 3+368-368-1=0+0+0+1 --

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1" OR 2+368-368-1=0+0+0+1 --

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1' OR 3+972-972-1=0+0+0+1 or 'KmHBGl1R'='

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1' OR 2+972-972-1=0+0+0+1 or 'KmHBGl1R'='

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1' OR 3+792-792-1=0+0+0+1 --

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1' OR 2+792-792-1=0+0+0+1 --

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1 OR 2+30-30-1=0+0+0+1

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1 OR 3+30-30-1=0+0+0+1

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1 OR 3+347-347-1=0+0+0+1 --

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

-1 OR 2+347-347-1=0+0+0+1 --

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Ivan Datsenko from Ukraine is the leader of the Indians and the agent of the Soviet intelligence service

e

lxbfYeaa

Secrets of June 22: The Stalin project – grave digging as the most important part of modern policy. Chapter XI

The estimates of Stalin’s activity as the head of the country and that historical period during which he directed the USSR, differ with the extreme polarization of opinions: from unconditional approval of activity of this personality to a complete negation of his merits and charge of genocide, totalitarianism, schizophrenia, mania of prosecution, etc. Meanwhile the story never be white or black, it is always multi-colour …

Stalin as the subject of the present

Disputes round Stalin's name continually all flash and flash with a new force. And as one of the directions of mass discussion becomes the destiny of the Polish officers buried in Katyn. While we will talk about that isn't subject to modern historians – about chronology of events.

So, on January 26, 1934 the non-aggression pact was signed between Germany and Poland. Germany signed declarations on non-aggression on September 30, 1398 with England and on December 6, 1938 with France. At the meeting in Munich the prime ministers of these countries Neville Chamberlain and Édouard Daladier agreed to inclusion of Sudeten area in structure of Germany (the Munich arrangement) in spite of the fact that before, even at Kaisers, this territory wasn't included into the structure of Germany. Then the Soviet Union joins the diplomatic game - it offers the help to Czechoslovakia in the case of a war with Germany on condition of granting possibility by Poland of passing of the Soviet armies through its territory.

It was refused. Czechoslovakia agrees on the Munich conditions and leaves Sudeten area where it is located its defensive fortification created on a case of war with Germany, being defenceless before possible (and future) German aggression. Poland has something from the division of Czechoslovakia too: the Teshin area went to it with support of Germany - disputable area which it considered as illegally occupied since 1919 year.

After that the western powers direct the military missions to the USSR for negotiation about the conclusions of a military alliance. However, the negotiations were unsuccessful and reached a deadlock, despite the putting forward the offer on April 17, 1939 by the USSR on creation of a united front of mutual aid between Great Britain, France and the USSR (see the appendix 1). By the way, it is well-known that if the delegation of the USSR was headed by the People's commissar of defence K.E.Voroshilov at these negotiations, so the western delegations obviously were directed by the minor persons…
According to Churchill, stated after the war, “an obstacle to the conclusion... of agreement was the horror, which the border states had before the Soviet help in the form of the Soviet armies... Poland, Romania, Finland and three Baltic states didn't know what they feared most of all - the German aggression or the Russian rescue... even now [in 1948] there can't be doubts that England and France should accept the offer of Russia, to proclaim the tripartite alliance”. It would be desirable for Stalin's modern accusers to cast these words in bronze and to hang up at a headboard of own beds …

Let’s continue. In August, 1939 the Non-aggression pact between the USSR and Germany was signed in Moscow and also the confidential annexes to it. The Soviet management got to know about the forthcoming invasion of Germany into Poland, Stalin approves the division of Poland between the USSR and Germany approximately in the area of Curzon line — border of Russia and Poland which was offered at establishment of new differentiating lines following the results of World War I. The structure of the Soviet Union in case of the German-Polish war has to include the territories of the Western Ukraine and the Western Belarus which appeared as a part of Poland by results of the Soviet-Polish war of 1920. On September 1, 1939 Germany arranges provocation and interferes in Poland.

In connection with the assumed obligations, the Great Britain (and its some dominions) and France declare the war to Germany. The Second World War begins. On September 17, when it became clear that Poland suffered defeat, the Soviet armies enter its territory. Let's remind that many modern accusers of the USSR and Russia accuse us that the USSR at the conclusion of the non-aggression pact, besides, concluded also the credit agreement with Germany.

Somehow the other day I happened to watch the known Soviet pre-war movie “If tomorrow the war …”. For some historians it serves as the object of sneers, de what Stalin was stupid, he didn't understand that England and France want to do only good for the USSR and they are its devoted friends. Meanwhile in this movie it is spoken openly about possible aggression of THREE POWERS and the form of aggressors completely copies a form … of the military personnel of England, France and Germany and it simply serves as confirmation of the known facts on desire of some political forces in the first two countries to agree with Hitler before the war.

By the way, the circumstances of flight of Hess on May 10, 1941 (in the eve of attack of Germany to the USSR!) still are secret in England … And why not to declassify them to the Englishmen? Especially as there is an example of the Russian president who has just declassified the case materials about Katyn.

The formation of the anti-Soviet block was obvious to the Soviet management. In these conditions the credit agreement with Germany is concluded. What the USSR received and gave is visible from enclosed documents: actually it was the great diplomatic success because, giving the raw materials, the Soviet Union received the latest technologies and even arms from future enemy! England started helping us only after the attack of fascist Germany. Before it remained really calm and even was very happy that Hitler turned to the east as at this time there was an air and sea fight for the British Isles. Even when the blockade Leningrad died of hunger, allies didn't open the second front. They didn't open it and in days of the Battle of Stalingrad. The human lives are more important. And so it turned out that the Soviet soldiers were at war against the Hitlerites, let with the part of the western weapon, but they gave own lives.

About professional falsifiers

Now we will reflect why, according to the Polish data, there were 230 thousand soldiers and officers of the Polish army in captivity in the territory of the USSR, among them as the Polish publicist and historian Y.Matskevich claims, there were 10 generals, 52 colonels, 72 lieutenant colonels, 5 131 other officers, 40 966 corporals, without considering the police ranks … Because after the aggression beginning, neither England, nor France didn't begin operations and the case was limited by the so-called “strange war”. The Polish government simply left the capital, the country and army. In such conditions the military defeat of Poland was inevitable.

By the way, Slovakia was at war on the party of Germany against Poland then which became as the sovereign state after the division of Czechoslovakia. It allocated two task forces for this purpose created on the basis of units 1 and 3rd of infantry divisions.

The first force represented the crew into which there were 6 rifle battalions, 2 artillery batteries and an engineering company under Anton Pulanich's general command. The second force was the horse motorized crew consisting of 2 cavalry battalions (having also motorcycles) and 9 mobile artillery batteries. Both forces made break through the Dukel pass and Novi Sad, promoted to Debica and seized Tarnuv area in the southwest of Poland. Actions of land forces were supported by the Slovak aircraft. The Air Force of Slovakia was created on the basis of Czechoslovak aircraft and included 358 warplanes.

There is a question: if the USSR participated in the division of Poland, than what Slovakia was engaged?

According to the operations of the Polish campaign the historian M.I.Semiryaga notes that “… within People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs absolutely confidential Management for prisoners of war and interned led by P.K.Soprunenko was founded on September 19, 1939. I.Khokhlov became his deputy, S. V. Nekhoroshev - his commissioner. The commander, the deputy the people's commissar of internal affairs V. V. Tchernyshev who submitting directly to Beria, supervised the Management.

After the termination of operations, the Soviet military power released only 42,4 thousand prisoners of war — the natives of the western regions of Ukraine and Belarus. The military authorities sent others as “criminals” to 138 “reception” centres and special camps which were under authority of the People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs. 42 492 persons were transferred to the Germans in October — November, 1939 and 562 persons were transferred by inquiries of the German embassy in 1940 — 1941. Some of them, especially Jews, refused flatly to leave on the homeland occupied by the Germans. As for the German authorities, from October, 1939 to spring of 1941 they transferred 13 757 former Polish citizens to the Soviet Union.

9 457 officers, including interned in Lithuania and Latvia, mainly the sons of wealthy Poles and representatives of the intellectuals were concentrated generally in three camps as the social element most “dangerous” to Stalin which were in Ostashkov, Starobelsk and Kozelsk. In these three special camps as the data of People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs archive found by N. S. Lebedeva testify, 8 348 officers, including 12 generals (from them 2 personnel), 567 majors (356 personnel), 1 534 captains (936 personnel), 1 830 lieutenants (480 personnel), 4 182 other officers (345 personnel), 18 chaplains were issued through the 1st special department of People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs. About the tragic destiny of this part of big group of the Polish officers there is a speech in a question of Katyn.

From the point of view of class fight, which was a basis of a state policy of the USSR at that time, namely the Polish bourgeoisie, generals and officers also was shot in the Katyn wood according to some historians.

At the same time the senior generation of Smolensk city well remembers that by the beginning of war, the captured Poles were in camps near Smolensk (there were three camps), they constructed the roads. It is known that during the fights for Smolensk, the Germans undertook vigorous flank maneuver and took the city by the blow from the South. Thus the security officers didn't take out and didn't remove any captured from under Smolensk. At that moment it was technically impossible: the highway and the railroads were cut and there were strongest fights to the east of camps. It is known also that there was a certain similarity of revolt among the captured when they were suggested to go to the east on foot, by the woods.

In the years of occupation in the city suburb in the settlement of Krasny Bor the fascists constructed an underground complex “Barenholle” (“Bear den”). After the war the concrete entrances to the bunker and approximate borders of a construction were well visible. Its construction began in the fall of 1941. And it was completely ready to the middle of August, 1942. All this was built by prisoners of war who probably shared the lot of the same unfortunate, who constructed similar buildings.

Feodor Velyakin, many times writing about Katyn, notes: “Those who endured occupation and without archive data knew that not only the Soviet prisoners of war, but also Poles, those officers who, having got rid of the Soviet captivity, got to German worked on the object. Total absence of information on further destiny of all these people is extremely clear answer to a question where they got then.

Kozi Gory, the village Katyn and the Katyn wood are to the west of Krasny Bor. Space shooting distinctly shows that the distance between the borders of forest area of Krasny Bor and the Katyn wood, makes about four kilometres in their modern configuration. It is not a problem at all to shoot in a protected zone, in next wood any quantity of the captured - though Polish, though Soviet...”

Historian Alexander Guryanov, the chairman of the Polish commission of the society “Memorial” tells:

“-the Polish emigration historiography after the end of war adhered all decades to figure in 2 million victims of political repression by Soviets (at first spoke about one and a half million), meaning those people who were the Polish citizens on September 1. It was supposed that all types of repressions would be considered. And near it to the 90th there was other figure, figure symbol 6 million citizens of Poland of the destroyed, namely destroyed by the Germans. It is clear that to round figure in 2 million stuck somehow to correlate the losses from Soviets to losses from the Germans. Discrepancy at these historians arose at once. In 1941 when there was a change in the Soviet-Polish relations and amnesty of all Polish citizens in the territory of the USSR was declared, it became clear that on all categories of victims of political repression – the special immigrants, concluded concentration camps, prisoners of war – 390 thousand turn out. It means, the ends didn't meet with the ends. What did the Polish historians do in this contradiction? They said that the others died in one and a half years. There was 400 thousand and still any number of people of whom Soviets don't want to amnesty and to keep in special camps. The Polish historian Shchedletsky and other representatives of this school considered that 700-800 thousand were lost.

It turns out that now I act as Stalin's defender, but when in the 90th the access to documents was open, quickly enough it became clear that the number of all victims of political repression nevertheless in 3-4 times less, than the Polish historians assumed. During the period since September 1939 till June 1941 in the territories seized by the USSR, slightly less than half a million people underwent all types of repressions. From 460 to 490 thousand, such gap turns out. And, if to speak about people, who lost the life (during this period) is 58 thousand. 33 thousand were shot, the others died in camps and on the settlement...”

Therefore for truth establishment, it would be quite logical to investigate the version that any part of prisoners of war of the Poles making according to the Soviet management of that time the threat for the USSR, could be really shot by bodies of People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs, and any by the Germans... It would be rather objective approach. Other question, is it possible to establish exact figures objectively now? It is unlikely... And, seemingly, similar statement of a question is not so pleasant to some political forces, wishing to put both Hitlerite Germany, and the Soviet Union on the same level... Therefore all “investigations” concerning the fault of the USSR for starting of World War II are put with solid scope and it directs at reflections that more they are directed against the modern Russia.

Alexey Tarasov from “Agency of national news” notes that for this purpose abroad even “specialized structures” with very solid budgetary (!) financing are created.

Further he tells that “… activity of apologists of “modern history” in Europe is not simply huge; it got distinct “industrial” forms. So, in Poland, according to the parliament decision the Institute of national memory works for two decades. It gained properties, not characteristic for scientific institution, having turned in peculiar “political police”. The institute initiates the lawsuits, accusing people of cooperation with “communistic intelligence services”, its employees act as accusers on trials.

In Slovakia the institute with the same name is created with the similar purposes. The neo-Nazi I.Petransky is appointed as “chief historian” there. Right after appointment he declared that “crimes of Nazis are already enough condemned and it is necessary to be engaged in crimes of communists much more densely”.

The similar institute is in Romania too. Its tasks include the collecting and studying of documents and also their publication concerning evolution of a communistic regime.

The Institute of studying of totalitarian regimes is created in the Czech Republic in 2007. The institute is financed by the state. Since 1995 the Management on documentation an investigation of communism crimes works in the Czech Republic - it is a full-fledged investigative body. Its priority directions are identification and investigation of politically motivated crimes of a communistic regime.

The Commission of historians at the president of the country works in Latvia. The Institute of foreign membership is formed; its tasks – providing officials with theses for “occupational” rhetoric and presentation of subject of “crimes against humanity in Latvia during the Soviet and Nazi occupation” on the international scene. The Centre of documentation of consequences of totalitarianism at Bureau on protection of the Constitution (subject promotion “People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs-KGB atrocities”, concealment of communications of the management of the Latvian intelligence services with a fascist Abwehr and SD) is created.

In Lithuania the vigorous similar activity is conducted by the Genocide and Resistention Centre. The centre is the department at the cabinet and its director is approved by Seim on representation of the prime minister. As well as at the Polish Institute of national memory, the department of special investigations functions as a part of the Lithuanian Centre.

In Estonia the period of “the Soviet occupation” is investigated by the Estonian international commission on investigation of crimes against humanity at the president of the republic, the Centre of researches of the Soviet period, Estonian bureau of the register of victims of political repression, Kistler-Ritso's Foundation and also the State commission on investigation of repressive policy of occupational forces. The last one prepared “The white book about the losses put to the people of Estonia with occupations”, formed as the basis for large-scale anti-Russian campaign and also for promotion of requirements to Russia “to indemnify the loss caused by occupation”.

Until recently Ukraine didn't lag behind also during the presidency of sir Yushchenko. The created Ukrainian institute of national memory provides “comprehensive study of fight for restoration of statehood of Ukraine and implementation of actions for perpetuating of memory of participants of national liberation fight, victims of “Holodomor” and political repressions”. The Ukrainian structures most actively work over two main concepts of audit of history. First, over the concept about “Holodomor”; secondly, over the concept about the Ukrainian liberation movement of the 1920-1950th years according to which the participants of liberation movement are “sechevoy Strelets” and the Ukrainian army organization of Left-bank and Right-bank Ukraine. The special attention is paid to OUN-UPA rehabilitation. It is characteristic that exactly the cult of “Holodomor” is directed on undermining treatment of World War II as fair from the Soviet Union.

In addition to research institutions, the important role in the re-write history plays a network of “Museum of occupation”. In Lithuania it is a “Museum of genocide”, in Georgia – “Museum of occupation”, in Ukraine – “Museum of Soviet occupation of Ukraine”. The main consumers of Museum exhibits are the youth, Western diplomats and journalists. Visit of “Museum of occupation” is included in the program of stay of foreign delegations. For example, “Museum of the occupation of Latvia” included in the official Protocol of the foreign Ministry, it necessarily attend by the official guests.

Tarasov is sure that “...the united front of the revision history of the Second World War is formed and operates and in Central Europe and in the post-Soviet space at the state level. Its activity has already produced certain results. The debate of the condemnation of “crimes of the Communist regime” is opened in the European Parliament.

The parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe adopted a resolution “On the need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian communist regimes”, actually equating fascism and communism. The European Parliament calls Russia to engage in a dialogue with the “democracies” of Eastern Europe on the problems of the history of the XX century.

How the future “democracy” fought with the Nazis...

Yes, it is very important to remind the figures, which no one denies... In 1941-1945 not only Germany, but also the whole of Europe was to conquer Russia. Finland has exposed 19 divisions and 13 brigades (1942), Hungary - 23 divisions and 6 brigades (1944), Romania - 21 divisions (1942), Italy - 7 divisions (1942), Slovakia - 3 division (1941). In addition to these divisions, the Norwegian part in the North, the Swedish battalion in Karelia fought against the Red Army.

Only in the battles for Leningrad participated the military units from countries such as Spain – 250 “blue” division, then the volunteer Legion, Norway - volunteer Legion “Norway”, then the 1st battalion of motorized infantry regiment “Norland”, Holland - volunteer Legion “the Netherlands”, then 23th regiment of infantry brigade of “the Netherlands”, Belgium - volunteer Legion “Flandria” and then the assault brigade “Langemark”, Denmark - infantry regiment “Danmark”, Sweden - in the structure of motorized division “Norland”, France - in the structure of 28th German light infantry division, Austria - in the structure of 9th air and field and other German divisions, Finland - volunteer battalion, Latvia - legion, then 2d Latvian brigade, then 19th volunteer infantry division, Estonia - legion, then 20s infantry division.

Except the Germans, three Croatian divisions and the Albanian division Skanderbeg resisted to the people of the USSR on the Balkans. One Croatian regiment was blocked in the Stalingrad copper. The Croatian flotilla acted on the Sea of Azov. The French regiment was in the German parts attacking Moscow. And this list can be continued. About in what scale it managed to Germans to mobilize the people of Europe in 1941- 1945 against us, allows to judge the national structure of the prisoners of war who have appeared in the Soviet camps. Not including Germans, there were:

313767 Hungarians,
187370 Romanians,
156682 Austrians,
69977 Czechoslovaks,
48957 Italians,
23138 French,
21822 Yugoslavs (Croats),
14129 Moldavians,
10173 Jews,
4729 Dutches,
2377 Finns,
2010 Belgians,
1652 Luxembourgers,
452 Danes,
457 Spaniards,
383 Gipsies,
101 Norwegians,
72 Swedes.

In total there were about 1, 8 million volunteers from Europe in Hitlerite army). Totally 59 divisions, 23 crews, plus some national regiments and legions. And it is only volunteers …

As the conclusion about a role of domestic politicians …


The history is not the letters which have stiffened in a stone. It is always reconsidered depending on the political order. Let's imagine: in 1903 or 1904 emperor Nicholas II addresses to the population of the Russian Empire in which accuses England, France and Turkey of aggression against Russia in … the Crimean war and demands the financial compensation from them. Or in 1862 Russia “comes down” on France and accuses it of genocide of the Russians in 1812!

It is necessary to understand accurately that our history is our history. And spits in our history are the spits in us. The mixed assessment of the Stalin period has the right to existence in the history, but this is the matter of historians, instead of politicians. Especially domestic …

Reasoning on that it is necessary to know precisely the number of victims of Stalin regime are also senseless, as desire precisely to know the number of stars in the Universe. In the same way the statements are senseless that existence of such exact data is capable to change our society today. Today it has a lot of problems, for example, the number of homeless children, a corruption index, a condition of army, etc. But these historical wanderings allow to receive huge budgetary injections which could be used much more productively. For example, for construction of kindergartens, increase in pensions, etc.
Real figures of the relation to Stalin, regularly sounded by sociologists, say that the considerable number of our fellow citizens concerns to him as to the great politician. However, as well as the Frenchmen to Napoleon …

The modern Russian politicians of all ranks should beware to build the activity on reckless charge of the Soviet period as actually they spread only once again that, not so innocent, by the way, time and force people to think of the present. And the history of the XX century demands objective estimates of all parties participating in the Second World War.

Read us in Telegram

Viewed : 1108   Commented: 0

Author: Yury Karnovsky

Publication date : 20 December 2012 01:00

Source: The world and we

Comments

НАШ КАНАЛ В ДЗЕНЕ