For the West the Boeing is brought down by militiamen regardless of investigation results

Destruction of the Malaysian Boeing was used by the Kiev mode and its western «partners» for activization of retaliatory operation in the Southeast of Ukraine —the political scientist, the director of the Kiev center of political researches and conflictology Mikhail Borisovich Pogrebinsky answers the questions of the Internet portal «The world and we».
— What consequences for succession of events on Donets Basin will be had by a situation with the brought-down Boeing? Will it make any cardinal changes to a course of retaliatory operation of the Ukrainian army?
There are already consequences as the military initiative was rather on the party of militiamen to this story with the Boeing, and then it passed to armed forces of Ukraine. They considerably strengthened the attacks to the centers where the main forces of militiamen are located. It is in many respects connected with that moral support which was got by the Ukrainian heads.
The public opinion was created by mass media and statements of leaders of some western countries, including, Barack Obama, that the representatives of a militia and, respectively, Russia which supported a militia are guilty in the tragedy with the Boeing. It gave some moral overweight and pushed to strengthening of activity of military operation on Donets Basin.
It is impossible to say that further succession of events will strongly depend on results of investigation as unambiguous conclusions are improbable — too many forces were enclosed in the sounded version by rather high western heads. Besides, even if many bases to suspect the Ukrainian party will be found, I don’t believe that Obama or Cameron will tell that they were mistaken and the shot was made really by representatives of the Ukrainian army who bear responsibility for it.
— Is the conflict often mentioned in mass media between Kolomoysky and Poroshenko? How it can influence the anti-terrorist operation development — will they act consolidated in this situation?
In an existing trend of strengthening of military activity and attempts «to smooth out» the regions from all resisting or «to squeeze out» them to Russia there are no bases for the conflict between Poroshenko and Kolomoysky. Here they act consolidated. But when all this will end, there will be numerous bases for the conflicts which surely will arise.
— How is it possible to explain a PR campaign against Kolomoysky which was developed on Inter T. V. channel? Does it that the open «war» between oligarchs began?
It is validly confrontation between certain oligarchs, but Poroshenko obviously didn’t take unambiguously the part of someone from them. On the contrary, he even gave opportunity to Kolomoysky to answer attacks against it on own «5th channel». In this situation he is rather on Kolomoysky’s party.
— That strategy which is everywhere used now in anti-terrorist operation — carpet bombings of residential quarters — will lead to success of this operation or to even more fierce resistance of a militia?
While we observe that it leads to success of operation, forces militiamen to leave settlements. Some cities and villages were left by militiamen after such massive, blind attack of residential quarters. But it is obvious that such approach from forces of anti-terrorist operation can’t long proceed and causes the reciprocal, sharp and uncompromising growth of resistance.